Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
2.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 29(3): 179-186, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956627

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spiralling numbers of patients are being referred on the two-week wait (2WW) head and neck cancer referral pathway. Only a small proportion are found to have cancer. There is a call for change in the management of these referrals, particularly following coronavirus. Allied health professionals (AHPs) are being encouraged by the NHS to extend their clinical practice to address increased demand. Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) may offer a solution to some of the 2WW pathway's challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence highlights problems with the pathway and reasons for change. Hoarse voice is consistently found to be the most common presenting symptom. Emerging evidence suggests SLTs can extend their scope of practice to manage new hoarse voice referrals. A pilot project is described. Outcomes from this and other ongoing studies explore efficacy and investment required to make this proposal an achievable prospect for the future. SUMMARY: The management of 2WW referrals on the head and neck cancer pathway needs to change. Preliminary findings suggest SLTs working within the context of the multidisciplinary team can safely extended their role to improve management of these patients. Professional role outline, recognition, guidance, and training framework are needed.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Language Therapy/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Speech Therapy/organization & administration , Voice Disorders/etiology , Adult , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Time-to-Treatment , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/therapy
3.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 101(10): 797-804, 2022 10.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1617016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV2-pandemic, people working in healthcare such as caregives for the elderly face additional burden, e.g. by the use of face masks. METHODS: In a prospective study, the emotional and physical wellbeing as well as the vocal tract discomfort of caregivers of two municipal homes for the elderly were assessed by questionnaires, the Mini-SCL and the Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale (VTDS), and one on personal data (sex, age, lung disease, previous SARS-CoV2-infection) and on voice symptoms. RESULTS: 67% of the questionnaires were answered by 56 women and 11 men aged 45.2 ± 11.5. In the Mini-SCL, increased scores were found in depression in 23.8%, anxiety in 49.3%, somatization in 55.2% and in the global score in 44.7%. 52% showed increased scores in the VTDS. Significant correlations were found in between the subscales of the Mini-SCL and the VTDS as well as to dysphonia symptoms. DISCUSSION: Psychological problems, somatization and vocal tract discomfort is more frequently reported by caregivers for the elderly than in the normal population. The VTDS, voice symptoms and the Mini-SCL scales are significantly related. Training on vocal hygiene should be included in workplace health promotion during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dysphonia , Voice Disorders , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Caregivers , Dysphonia/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Quality
4.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(4): 1701-1708, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1431684

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The authors aim to review available reports on the potential effects of masks on voice and speech parameters. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases through July 2021. Several targeted populations, mask scenarios and methodologies were approached. The assessed voice parameters were divided into self-reported, acoustic and aerodynamic. RESULTS: It was observed that the wearing of a face mask has been shown to induce several changes in voice parameters: (1) self-reported-significantly increased vocal effort and fatigue, increased vocal tract discomfort and increased values of voice handicap index (VHI) were observed; (2) acoustics-increased voice intensity, altered formants frequency (F2 and F3) with no changes in fundamental frequency, increased harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR) and increased mean spectral values in high-frequency levels (1000-8000 Hz), especially with KN95 mask; (3) aerodynamics-maximum phonatory time was assessed in only two reports, and showed no alterations. CONCLUSION: Despite the different populations, mask-type scenarios and methodologies described by each study, the results of this review outline the significant changes in voice characteristics with the use of face masks. Wearing a mask shows to increase the perception of vocal effort and an alteration of the vocal tract length and speech articulatory movements, leading to spectral sound changes, impaired communication and perception. Studies analyzing the effect of masks on voice aerodynamics are lacking. Further research is required to study the long-term effects of face masks on the potential development of voice pathology.


Subject(s)
Voice Disorders , Voice , Acoustics , Humans , Phonation , Speech , Speech Acoustics , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Disorders/prevention & control , Voice Quality
5.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(11): 4383-4390, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1293368

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), teachers during the pandemic have had to adapt to online teaching at short notice. This study aims to investigate the voice symptoms and their environmental risk factors as well as the work ability associated with distance teaching and to compare these with symptoms in previous contact teaching. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 121 primary and secondary school teachers across Finland. The survey was advertised online through social media and the replies collected from voluntarily participating teachers. RESULTS: During distance teaching vocal symptoms appeared less often than in school with 71% teachers experiencing them in regular teaching and 44% in distance teaching, VHI result decreased from 7.88 in school teaching to 4.58 in distance teaching. Acoustic conditions were reported to be more suitable in distance teaching with 73% of teachers finding them adequate during distance teaching in comparison to 46% for those in regular teaching. Background noise was the most disturbing factor for a teacher's voice in the classroom and in distance teaching and this was even more conspicuous in the classroom. Also, subjectively experienced poor indoor air quality at school influenced the voice negatively. Further, voice problems were associated with increased subjective stress levels and reduced ability to work. CONCLUSION: Distance teaching has affected teachers' voices in a positive way compared with regular teaching. This difference is likely to be due to better acoustics and indoor air quality in distance teaching conditions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Diseases , Voice Disorders , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/etiology
6.
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol ; 47(3): 194-201, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1228353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, professional caregivers caring for the elderly may experience more vocal tract problems in addition to regular high vocal demands while wearing face masks/coverings. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: Vocal tract discomfort (VTD) was assessed in 64 caregivers in one home for the elderly (64% participation rate) in June 2020 using the German version of the VTD scale. RESULTS: More than one-half of the participating caregivers experienced VTD, described mostly as dryness, irritability, and tightness. Approximately, 80% reported that sensations were not perceived before enhanced infection prevention standards were implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Among caregivers caring for the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic, special care should be focused on the voice and vocal tract well-being.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Caregivers , Humans , Pandemics , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Quality
7.
J Voice ; 35(2): 169, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1031440
8.
J Voice ; 36(6): 784-792, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894101

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via respiratory particles. Respiratory particle emission is impacted by manner of breathing and voicing, as well as intersubject variability. Assessment and treatment of voice disorders may include tasks that increase respiratory particle emission beyond typical breathing and speaking. This could increase the risk of disease transmission via respiratory particles. METHODS: Respiratory particle emission was measured during a single-subject, repeated measures clinical simulation of acoustic and aerodynamic assessment and voice therapy tasks. An optical particle sizer was used to measure particle count (1-10 µm in diameter). Assessment and therapy tasks were completed in three conditions: (1) 15 cm from the device, (2) 1 m from the device, and (3) 1 m from the device with the subject wearing a surgical mask. RESULTS: Condition 1 generated the highest particle count, with a median of 5.1 (13) additional particles above baseline, which was statistically significant (U = 381.5, P= 0.002). In condition 1, therapy and acoustic tasks combined produced more particles compared to the baseline and speech tasks, with a median difference of 6.5 additional particles per time point (U = 309.0, P= 0.002). This difference was not significant for conditions 2 and 3. Peak particle generation occurred in specific phonatory tasks, which was most pronounced in condition 1. Voice therapy tasks during condition 1 generated the highest peaks of normalized total particles with classical singing and expiratory muscle strength training. There was a significant difference in the amount of particle generation between condition 1 and 2, with a median difference of 5.2 particles (U = 461.0, P= 0.002). The particle count difference between conditions 2 and 3 was 2.1 (U = 282.0, P= 0.292), and this difference was not significant. The normalized total particles were assessed over time for each condition. For all conditions, there was no significant accumulation of particles. CONCLUSIONS: For a single subject, production of voice assessment and therapy tasks combined resulted in an increased number of respiratory particles compared to speech and baseline (1-10 µm). EMST and classical singing generated the greatest concentration of particles. Respiratory particle counts were higher at 15 cm from the particle sizer compared to 1 m from the particle sizer, suggesting that physical distancing may reduce immediate clinician exposure to respiratory particles. Particle concentration did not accumulate over time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/therapy , Phonation , Respiratory System , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Disorders/therapy
9.
J Voice ; 36(6): 879.e13-879.e19, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-809297

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: With the COVID-19 outbreak around the globe and its potential effect on infected patients' voice, this study set out to evaluate and compare the acoustic parameters of voice between healthy and infected people in an objective manner. METHODS: Voice samples of 64 COVID-19 patients and 70 healthy Persian speakers who produced a sustained vowel /a/ were evaluated. Between-group comparisons of the data were performed using the two-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. RESULTS: The results revealed significant differences in CPP, HNR, H1H2, F0SD, jitter, shimmer, and MPT values between COVID-19 patients and the healthy participants. There were also significant differences between the male and female participants in all the acoustic parameters, except jitter, shimmer and MPT. No interaction was observed between gender and health status in any of the acoustic parameters. CONCLUSION: The statistical analysis of the data revealed significant differences between the experimental and control groups in this study. Changes in the acoustic parameters of voice are caused by the insufficient airflow, and increased aperiodicity, irregularity, signal perturbation and level of noise, which are the consequences of pulmonary and laryngological involvements in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Voice Quality , Speech Acoustics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Acoustics , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL